My Photo

AuthorBuzz.com

  • AuthorBuzz
    Help Yourself! IF NO ONE KNOWS YOUR BOOK EXISTS THEY WON'T BUY IT. Authorbuzz.com is M.J.'s one stop book marketing solution for authors and publishers. Reach 600,000 readers (and up), leaders of more than 35,000 bookclubs, 3000 booksellers & 12,000 librarians via AuthorBuzz notes. Reach millions more via blog ad or Goodreads or Facebook campaigns. We work with all the top publishers and hundreds of wonderful writers every year and do over 70% repeat business.
Subscribe to Shelf Awareness and enter to win a free book!
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

« THE DOCTOR IS IN | Main | First Madonna and Radiohead; Next, James Patterson: Part 2 »

November 05, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cbed153ef00e54f8ddf968834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference First Madonna and Radiohead; Next, James Patterson PART 1:

Comments

gregory huffstutter

Very interesting column. I too agree that it's a "when" not "if" for alternate distribution models to seriously alter the book business beyond the explosion of POD authors.

If you can get the new Barry Eisler release by inserting your credit card into a ubiquitous street-corner vending machine -- and out pops a freshly-bound paperback for your train ride home -- what role will Borders and Barnes & Noble play in the future?

And if book binding becomes as cheap and easy to do at home as printing your own vacation pictures, will Lulu find itself struggling for relevence?

It seems to me that if editing (which could be freelanced) and guaranteeing shelf space at distribution points is no longer the main selling point for traditional publishers, their main function will be business partners in financing a publicity push. Because that's the one area where an author selling a POD novel out of the back of his/her van cannot compete.

Radiohead already has a built-in fan base, so they don't need to build name recognition -- which makes it an easier buisness proposition for them to self-release. But for every indie success story (like "Clap Your Hands Say Yeah"), you've got thousands of bands who tried that model and only sold CDs/downloads to their friends and family.

So too, I believe, will go the book business. A few indie authors will be good enough or get lucky enough to break into the mainstream consciousness. But building the next bestseller will still require the credibility and deeper pockets of the traditional publishing houses.

People Magazine only does so many book reviews per issue. Amazon.com will only sell so many banner ads on their homepage. And Jay Leno only interviews so many authors per year. If a publisher can make those happen for their authors -- through industry contacts and/or paid placements -- that gives them long-term value over mere distribution.

connie

It does seem to be in the cards. The only thing I fear with all this new technology is that there will be a glut of music,movies and manuscripts flooding the market. The problem with this is most of that material will be of sub-standard quality. The companies that have been involved in distribution and other aspects of getting these out to the public have also worked as a filter system. Yes, it is true that often that filter system has worked against actual talent- real talent- but with the right determination the talent has managed to get through. Without such a filtering system- the public is forced to wade through alot of nonessential material before they reach real masterpieces!

Zinnia Hope

Great post. I've noticed a lot of changes in the movie industry such as the computer graphic films that turn actors and actresses into 4D versions and then they supply the voice. Yuck. Don't like that at all.

Neal Stapel

In my opinion, a very accurate fact based prediction. Change is all around us and as usual technology is way ahead of the average person. Most people purchase a computer that is capable of running a business, but end up e-mailing and surfing the web.

Like Mr. Eisler has pointed out, there are those that will use today’s technology and push the envelope making room for their own place in today’s media jungle.

Slowly the moguls that have reined supreme for so long are being nudged aside making room for less traditional thinkers.

As usual, VERY nice piece Barry.

Neal

Leila

Thanks for a very informative piece Barry. Just this morning I was reviewing Time Magazine's article on Best inventions of the Year and saw the Espresso Book Machine. I agree with you whole heartedly that it is just a matter of time. The machine will supposedly offer the copies at just $3 a book. It's going to be interesting ;)

Great blog as always!

C.M. Mayo

Fascinating, thanks. I myself have bought several self-published books this year, most recently Edward Tufte's books. He self-publishes them and they are both gorgeous and visionary. You can read more about his work at www.tufte.com Interestingly, the price of his one day course includes his four books, delivered at registration as a handsome boxed set. Similarly, I ended up with a free copy of Joshua Leeds's excellent anthology "Sonic Alchemy: Conversations with Leading Sound Practitioners" when I bought some of his CDs off his website, www.sound-remedies.com. But selling books in this indirect way, that's another subject.

Klaus Jaritz

Great Barry.
But: would there be 'THE' Madonna today without Warner Bros in the first place - or would there be 'A' Madonna with her songs among a million others hoping to be noticed and picked up by chance? Yes, it's great to eliminate the distribution hassle. But don't be too casual about the enormous publicity needed to cut through all that noise on the web. How is an unknown artist to manage that? The publisher doesn't just distribute, the publisher is the complete launching pad.
A side thought:
I am an avid reader and travel a lot. On the way I stop at second hand shops. I scan the spine of their books. I don't look for authors or titles - I look for the Penguin icon. It's a guarantee that an author is of interest.
Cheers - Klaus

AngiS

I don't know about the book industry. As a REAL reader, that is a person who really LOVES books, I would probably, if I had the money, pay for a first edition hard cover just so I could continue to experience the pleasure of turning the pages of a nicely bound book. What I think will happen is that the consumer will have the choice between the POD or a more "luxury" version from a publisher, complete with real parchment paper and library quality bindings and leather covers...I love animals and I love cows...but I love steak too...so if they are going to kill the cows to eat, then why not use the leather for something nice? Anyway, I digress...that is what I think will happen to the publishing industry...there will no longer be paperbacks...you could download these and read them on your iPod or cell phone...personally, though, I like the clipboard sized readers with the touch corners that turn the page. BUT, there is nothing like curling up with a good book on a rainy day. A real book...no technology...I think it would take away from the experience. Kinda like a big screen with a picture of a roaring fire instead of a real fire, it just wouldn't have the same feeling. For the same reason that I hand-knit and hand-crochet my own throws and sweaters, I would continue to want to feel the slight roughness of the pages, to smell the "book" smell - yes there is one - and to be able to experience things the way they used to be. Technology just can't replace the feelings associated with holding a book in your hand, snuggled up in a nice warm blanket, with a cup of hot tea or good coffee and a carafe right there beside it, and a nice room with overstuffed chairs and thick plush rugs. Its the experience..and I think people will be willing to pay for that. If they can...I think, unfortunately, that public libraries will suffer the most..and that is a shame - for it is my librarian, Mrs. Lee, who "turned me on" to some of my favorite authors.

The music industry needs some change. Right now, talent is determined by producers or talent scouts with over-inflated egos who THINK they know what the public wants. They are the ones who made Britney Spears a star. Granted, I could have seen her as a dancer...but she can't sing. Christina Aguilara, on the other hand, is one of the most talented singers to come about in the modern world of music...a true prodigy...but she was the last of the last of the Mouseketeers to get signed to a label..and she should have been the first, if it was solely based on talent. The world has become shallow. However, there are still a few of us (actually more than a few of us) who actually CARE about the music. Most of today's stars would never have made it in the 60's and 70's - the "Golden Age" of modern music IMHO. Likewise, Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, Bob Dillion, etc. would never have been accepted in today's musical climate where looks are more important than talent. There are a few breakthrough talents, but even the most talented new bands got their start on MySpace or by promoting themselves over the internet. American Idol also had a huge impact on what we listen to now...and it ultimately came down to what America wanted. I think as the proliferation of social networking sites, such as MySpace, expand...then you will see more talent being "discovered" because they took the initiative and self-advertised. Same goes with young filmmakers and You Tube. Without MySpace and You Tube, these people would never have been noticed...with them, they made Good Morning America and the late night talk show circuit before they were even signed to a label. Sure there are "flashes in the pan", but some of my favorite "CD"s right now are from bands and artists (Go Lemon!!) that I discovered myself on MySpace. They will not appeal to the average teenager because, well, they aren't "like, Hot" (to quote the Paris Hilton's of the world - shudder), but they make GREAT music.

The film industry I think will, unfortunately, always be ruled by the studios...for one reason...it can be distributed via digital media...but good film making - even the animated kind - takes a hell of a lot of money...the kind of money that studios provide. Fortunately, there is still the occasional great film. They haven't completely lost their art to the mindless comedies and horror films. (Although, sometimes I like these...especially stupid comedies.) And, the first Friday the 13th (you have to be old to remember that one) actually had a "killer" plot (okay, that was a BAD pun). But I think you understand what I'm saying. It doesn't take a lot of money to produce a book. It doesn't take a lot of money to cut an album (maybe to make a good video - but not to cut the music). It does; however, take TONS of money to make a GOOD film. Even the small "Indie" films take a million or so and, let's be honest, most of the artist's out there trying to make it, just don't have access to that kind of money. So, they have to have the backing of a studio.

And, that's just my two cents' worth...

Personanondata

Interesting and I mostly agree also. With respect to the movie industry you haven't taken the example far enough. About ten years ago all movie distribution companies were gung ho about satellite distribution to movie houses. It would avoid shipping film reels, errors and delays and importantly enabled better accounting so houses could no longer cheat on showings. It failed because the houses saw nothing in it for them against the significant capital improvements they would have to make. Move ahead 10 years and we are again talking about digital distribution but the landscape is significantly different. As consumers we can all get new 50in flat screen TVs in our homes and we don't need a movie house any longer. (And there aren't enough of them any way). It is only a matter of time before first run movies are distributed direct to consumers together with consumer (behavoral) ad placement. Ergo: very flat distribution.

With respect to books/publishing, in my view we won't even remember the Expresso machine in three years. Led by the iPhone, consumers will consume more and more books on these handheld platforms and 'vending' locations will be ubiquitous (including B&N etc.) E-books will not replace hardcopy books in total. They may replace trade paper in dramatic fashion over the next five years. (I will make another point on your next post about retail). The Expresso machine is impressive technology and will retain a place in libraries and academia but I see us the typical high street consumer skipping over the on-demand opporuntunity of printed works to simply e-content on a handheld.

And all this from someone who only buys hardcover titles and collects first editions!

Chuck

The reason, I think, folks don't want to download books is the portability factor. I want to be able to carry a book with me on the plane, train or to the beach. I don't want to worry about getting sand in a device for my $9.99 paperback version of a best seller; I want to be able to flip it into the car with the flip flops and towels. Now a digital book...a small, virtually indestructable device that is hand held, portable, water proof, about the size of a small paperback book used to download books...that I would use...Hmmm.

Jenny

There are 100,000 people out there who think they can write a readable book who can't. When a publisher publishes a book, it tells the reader that book probably isn't crap.

With music, you can listen online and decide if it's crap on your own. With a video clip on YouTube, you can judge a movie. With a book, it really isn't possible to know if something is crap without reading a lot of it, a time consuming task, since the first chapter can be fine but the author have no idea how to make a novel work.

So we rely on publishers to tell us that a book will meet some standard of competence.

POD solved the download to print problem a few years ago. The problem no one has really solved is how can you let people know your book isn't dreadful if you don't have a publisher vouching for its quality?

I have sold a lot of self-published books via the Web, but I only could do that after I published several books with big publishers so people knew they could trust that I could write.

Arnold

Although I'd like to be idealistic and believe that Radiohead and Madonna are personally looking out for us as fans, and are therefore excited to offer-up their albums for free online to whomever feels ethical in taking it... I can also see a big 'PROMOTION' hook attached to the zero-dollar price tag that accompanies the release of such online tracks by these majors... Not at all coincidentally, Radiohead also has a BOX SET for sale... (nudge nudge wink wink)... The REAL PRODUCT on the market that DOES NOT HAVE A CHOSE YOUR OWN PRICE, OR A FREE OPTION! C'mon, it doesn't take a genius to read past the little flacid worm and see the big flashy hook that it is attached to. Sure the majors are now being generous, they are also being sly and competetive with the independent producers who are out there offering it up for free as a way to gain EXPOSURE for their artistic work. This is a way of infiltrating a larger market base by gaining a more in-depth exposure for the real product... sorry to burst the bubble, I know it feels better to just grin at the worm.... The one positive that I can grin about in this process is the elimination of the music industry's long over-conflated empires of middle men called... "Major Record Labels"... however, given a personnage like Madonna's ongoing dependency on the Hollywood Empire, I kinda wonder if there are a few sneaky tyrants with their fingers in the pie somewhere behind the curtain....

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

By M.J. Rose

  • M. J. Rose: The Collector of Dying Breaths: A Novel of Suspense

    M. J. Rose: The Collector of Dying Breaths: A Novel of Suspense
    Indie Next Pick Amazon Best of April Mystery/Suspense "Gripping--a suspenseful and enigmatic story... captivating... compelling, imaginative." (Kirkus) "A page-turning, alluring concoction of fiction infused with fantastical yet actual history. Readers will be mesmerized by her enchanting narrative, which takes them on a mystical and magical journey." (Library Journal - Starred "Rose masterfully combines romance, mystery, and dual timelines…The storyline and extensive historical details…are fascinating.” (Romantic Times TOP PICK)) "Mysterious, magical, and mythical…what a joy to read!" (Sara Gruen, New York Times bestselling author of Water for Elephants)


  • M. J. Rose: Seduction: A Novel of Suspense

    M. J. Rose: Seduction: A Novel of Suspense
    Indie Next List. Intriguing, absorbing, and utterly captivating, Seduction will leave you begging for a sequel." —Books & Books "Mysterious, haunting, and tragic, Seduction emerges as a suspenseful alchemy of potent ingredients, beautifully blended, that ignites your senses and leaves you aching for more." (Jamie Ford, New York Times bestselling author of Hotel on the Corner of Bitter and Sweet ) "Seduction is an absolute pleasure to read -- clever, suspenseful, exciting, mysterious, learned, and engrossing. Some of the best historical fiction I've read in quite some time and just plain reading fun. M.J. Rose is at the top of her game, and that is saying something." (David Liss, bestselling author of The Twelfth Enchantment )

  • M. J. Rose: The Book of Lost Fragrances: A Novel of Suspense

    M. J. Rose: The Book of Lost Fragrances: A Novel of Suspense
    INDIE NEXT PICK SUSPENSE Best of 2012 PW Best of Mystery/Suspense Spring 2012 "Deliciously sensual...Rose imbues her characters with rich internal lives in a complex plot that races to a satisfying finish." (Publisher's Weekly (starred and boxed) "Compelling... suspenseful tale. Once you catch a whiff, you will be enchanted". - Associated Press "Rose has entered another realm and written what is bound to be one of this year's best books." -- Seattle Post-Intelligencer "The Book of Lost Fragrances by M.J. Rose is an amazing novel, an utterly engrossing thriller that weaves together reincarnation, ancient Egypt, international intrigue, and a lost book of fragrances. Elegantly written, with unforgettable characters and flawlessly realized international settings, here is a novel that will keep you up all night—and leave you with powerful feelings of revelation, wonder, and the infinitude of human possibility." —New York Times bestselling author Douglas Preston

  • Seen on FOXTV as PAST LIFE : The Reincarnationist

    Seen on FOXTV as PAST LIFE : The Reincarnationist
    THE REINCARNATIONIST. Starred Library Journal Review. Starred Publisher's Weekly Review. Booksense Pick for September and 2007 Highlight List. "A fascinating story of reincarnation that is one of the year's most ambitious and entertaining thrillers." - David Montgomery - Chicago Sun-Times

  • May 2010 : The Hypnotist - Best of 2010 Fiction - January Magazine

    May 2010 : The Hypnotist - Best of 2010 Fiction - January Magazine
    "Stunning page-turner" PW - (Starred)-------------- "In the third transfixing thriller in her Reincarnationist series, Rose continues to excite readers with enthralling tales of lives past and present interconnecting." Library Journal

  • People Magazine Pick of the Week : The Memorist

    People Magazine Pick of the Week : The Memorist
    "Gripping… Rose once again skillfully blends past and present with a new set of absorbing characters in a fascinating historical locale." - Starred Review, Library Journal ------------------------------ "Rose's fascinating follow up to The Reincarnationist... skillfully blends past life mysteries with present day chills. The result is a smashing good read." -Starred Review, Publisher's Weekly

  • Finalist for the Gumshoe award for Best Thriller of 2006.: The Venus Fix

    Finalist for the Gumshoe award for Best Thriller of 2006.: The Venus Fix
    "One of the year's best thrillers." -- David Montgomery (reviewer for the Chicago Sun et al.) "M.J. Rose is a bold, unflinching writer and her resolute honesty puts her in a class by herself." - Laura Lippman

  • James Patterson: Thriller: Stories To Keep You Up All Night

    James Patterson: Thriller: Stories To Keep You Up All Night
    I'm a proud member of this anthology that's gotten stars from PW & Library Journal!

  • : Lying In Bed

    Lying In Bed
    After years of toying with the idea... my first erotic novel. In stores May 30th. Order now.

Subscribe to MJRStreetTeam

Powered by us.groups.yahoo.com

April 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
Blog powered by Typepad